Work Text:
case begins:
25 rookie f1 club
sackarias:
i’ve been gathering proof
gabriellaaaa:
on what?
sackarias:
kimi and charlie
andrea:
what?
lottery:
what do you need proof for?
what have we done bro
bear:
what’s the proof?
sackarias:
i’m developing a case
on kimi and charlie being related
i am the law:
oh not this again
do or do not:
again?
i am the law:
he’s been going on about this all week
andrea:
you think we’re related??
sackarias:
i’m building a case
lottery:
you said
bear:
i see it
frankii:
see what?
i am the law:
scroll up
frankii:
ohhh
kk
sackarias:
would you like me to read the case file?
andrea:
you made a file?
lottery:
only a file?
you’re slacking isack
bear:
i need a 48 slide ppt with special effects and spinning banners
sackarias:
i dont have all the time in the world ollie!!
i am the law:
but you have enough to build a case
sackarias:
we’re around them every weekend
frankii:
i kinda see it
lottery:
see what?
frankii:
the resemblance
lottery:
are we still talking about this?
gabriellaaaa:
@sackarias whats the proof
sackarias:
case in point:
i am the law:
oh here we go
sackarias:
subjects: andrea kimi antonelli and charlotte marino-balanotti
evidence:
1. both have similar features
2. both italian
3. there’s childhood pictures of them together
4. they were ‘neighbours’ growing up
5. both know a lot about each other
6. often hang out outside of work
7. charlie once said that she texts kimi's nonna
8. kimi and charlie’s aunts seems fairly familiar with each other when she last visited the paddock
9. charlie said that she’s been invited to kimi’s aunt’s wedding
10. she has referred to him as her cousin more than once but it’s often come across a joke
hypothesis: if this isn’t proof then i don’t know what it is. at this point, i hope they’re related because otherwise imma be pretty confused.
assistance on this case: liam lawson (unwillingly) and oliver bearman (he said he’s here for ‘the vibes’)
gabriellaaaa:
not the full names
lottery:
wtf
andrea:
ollie u betrayed me
bear:
there was vibes!!
i am the law:
i have no part in this
frankii:
he makes a very convincing point
do or do not:
@lottery you’re invited to kimi’s aunt’s wedding?
lottery:
we’re close
sackarias:
that’s your defence?
lottery:
well clearly i have no lawyer
andrea:
why did u put ‘neighbours’
we were neighbours
bear:
charlie how many mercedes drivers have u lived next too???
lottery:
just the two
sackarias:
well do people see my point now
lottery:
no
andrea:
no
i am the law:
again
i want no part in this
sackarias:
i hate all of you
bear:
hey i agree with you
sackarias:
thank you ollie
andrea:
ollie no
you’re supposed to me on my side amore
bear:
oops sorry isack i don’t agree actually
frankii:
fucking simp
gabriellaaaa:
simp
bear:
don’t call me a simp when you two exist
do or do not:
ANYWAY
andrea:
he’s got a point
frankii:
shut up andrea
andrea:
bro
sackarias:
so does no one actually believe me
lottery:
no your case is shit
sackarias:
fuck u
official formula wtf-is-this
isack:
case in point:
subjects: andrea kimi antonelli and charlotte balanotti
evidence:
1. both have similar features
2. both italian
3. there’s childhood pictures of them together
4. they were ‘neighbours’ growing up
5. both know a lot about each other
6. often hang out outside of work
7. charlie once said that she texts kimi's nonna
8. kimi and charlie’s aunts seems fairly familiar with each other when she last visited the paddock
9. charlie said that she’s been invited to kimi’s aunt’s wedding
10. she has referred to him as her cousin more than once but it’s often come across a joke
hypothesis: if this isn’t proof then i don’t know what it is. at this point, i hope they’re related because otherwise imma be pretty confused.
assistance on this case: liam lawson (unwillingly) and oliver bearman (he said he’s here for ‘the vibes’)
charlie:
are you fucking kidding me?
isack:
try argue with it now bitch
charlie:
the fuck u calling a bitch
you literally won’t accept no for answer
isack:
BECAUSE I KNOW IM RIGHT
lando:
yo what
ngl i see it
isack:
THANK YOU
george:
Has this been brought up again?
liam:
this has happened before?
lewis:
Isack gathered his information from half the grid
charlie:
lewis i need names ASAP
george:
Charlie, relax
Isack, why is this a topic of conversation?
isack:
i speak nothing but the truth
gabi:
that is bullshit
franco:
complete bullshit wtf
isack:
FRANCO I THOUGHT U AGREED WITH ME
franco:
i do i was just saying that you don’t always speak the truth
liam:
he’s right about that
isack:
this is bullying
kimi:
this is harassment
why can’t u leave us alone
isack:
because i know im right
logan:
@charlie he’s built a good case ngl
charlie:
logan do NOT encourage this
lando:
im with logan
oscar:
That’s a surprise
lando:
hey we get alog smetimes
franco:
alog?
oscar:
He means along
franco:
ohhh
isack:
erm hellooo
can we go back to my case please?
charlie:
what case?
kimi:
its a stupid case
isack:
putain where’s ollie, he agrees with me
@ollie
ollie:
sorry isack but if i agree i’m on a kiss ban for the rest of the week
isack:
WTF
gabi:
fucking simp
ollie:
you wanna talk about being a simp?
george:
Guys please
Isack, can you expand on your case please?
charlie:
george why tf r u encouraging him?
kimi:
george he refused to make a powerpoint so i wouldn’t encourage
isack:
I DIDNT REFUSE I JUST DONT HAVE THE TIME
lewis:
But you have the time to make a whole case?
logan:
and interview people??
isack:
yes because i see you all every other weekend
george:
You also travel alot
That could be your free time?
liam:
he spends his plane time forcing me into games of uno
kimi:
where he cheats
isack:
NO I DONT
gabi:
yes you do
franco:
you do
ollie:
can confirm
charlie:
you do cheat isack
isack:
WTF MAN
yuki:
why tf is my phone blowing up?
i’m trying to sleep bro
liam:
isack is trying to convince the group that kimi and charlie are related
logan:
it’s getting mixed opinions
isack:
cmon yuki u have to agree with me man
george:
Yuki, I wouldn’t encourage this if I were you
yuki:
i thought we already went over this
but ngl i see it
kimi:
per l'amor di dio
charlie:
isack, you’re getting on my nerves
i’m going to put you in the wall in zandvoort
just fyi
isack:
you know i’m right
lewis:
I don’t think this is going to end overly well
alex:
why are they just rage baiting each other??
george:
What is rage bait?
lando:
george u don’t kw wat rage biat
alex:
lando the spelling is right there
lando:
it’s not the same?
oscar:
it’s B A I T not I A T
lando:
ohhh
thx osc
alex:
seriously though george how do u not know what rage bait is
george:
Forgive me for not being chronically online like yourself
logan:
you don’t need to be chronically online to know what rage bait is
even oscar knows what it is
oscar:
Only because you do it to me all the time
logan:
it’s well deserved
george:
Is no one going to explain to me what it is?
alex:
no
lando:
nope
logan:
no sorry
george:
I hate all of you
max:
don’t worry we hate you too
george:
Fuck you, Max
carlos:
Wait
What did I miss?
lewis:
You don’t want to know
kimiko, charletta
kimiko: dovremmo dire loro la verità?
(should we just tell them the truth?)
charletta: cosa ha ragione?
(what that he’s right?)
non ci avrebbe mai fatto sapere la fine
(no way he’d never let us hear the end of it)
kimiko: buon punto
(good point)
è divertente in questo modo
(it is funny this way)
sta diventando così fastidioso
(he’s getting so annoyed)
charletta: lo so che è esilarante
(i know it’s hilarious)
kimiko: hai davvero intenzione di metterlo nel muro di Zandvoort?
(are you actually going to put him in the wall at Zandvoort?)
charletta: non mi vedrà mai arrivare
(he’ll never see me coming)
kimiko: oh dio
(oh god)